Google Antigravity 2.0 vs CLI vs IDE Extensions

On this page

Quick answer

Choose Antigravity 2.0 for an integrated agentic development environment, Antigravity CLI for terminal and automation-oriented work, and Antigravity for IDEs when developers must stay in an existing editor. All three sit inside Gemini Enterprise AI developer tools, but the user’s edition, invoiced Cloud Billing account, IAM role, admin settings, and live surface availability must be verified.

Google’s August 2026 launch names VS Code as available and Visual Studio, JetBrains, and Zed as preview surfaces. Do not turn a general AI developer tools GA statement into a claim that every editor extension is GA.

Selection table

SurfaceBest starting pointMain review
Antigravity 2.0Integrated agent planning and developmentWorkspace, file, terminal, browser, MCP, model, and audit policy
Antigravity CLITerminal tasks, scripts, and pipeline experimentsAuthentication, noninteractive scope, secrets, command authority, retries, and spend
IDE extensionExisting editor workflow and local project contextExtension lifecycle, update channel, workspace trust, file and terminal permissions

The admin console can expose common governance, but each surface still needs denial and recovery tests. A configured sandbox does not prove the generated code is correct, a terminal command is authorized, or an MCP tool is safe.

Pilot rule

Start with one reversible repository, explicit file and command boundaries, no production credentials, required checks, human review, token and overage monitoring, and a documented stop path. Test unauthorized files, risky commands, browser and MCP denial, model unavailability, quota exhaustion, duplicate work, and rollback.

Use the setup guide for admin prerequisites and the readiness checklist before expanding access.

Official sources

Source check: August 23, 2026. Recheck editions, billing, roles, editor lifecycle, settings, models, quotas, and overages.