This Page Owns Paid-Plan and Credit Economics
Use this route after a representative project passes the output, rights, and watermark checks. Compare current paid plans by the accepted videos they can deliver, including model-specific credit use, top-ups, stock, renewal period, queue behavior, and editing time.
For the actual pre-purchase project and commercial-output checklist, use the complementary InVideo evaluation guide.
Quick Answer
InVideo now describes paid usage through credits, not the older weekly AI-generation-minute table. Its current paid plan names are Plus, Max, Generative, and Elite. Start with an available evaluation path to test one real video brief, then consider a paid plan only after you know which models you use, how many retries an accepted video takes, and whether stock or higher-volume generation is part of the workflow.
Do not choose a plan from an old Free/Plus/Max price screenshot. InVideo says model and agent prices can change, credit costs vary by model, unused credits do not roll over, and on-demand top-ups are available. Check the live InVideo pricing page immediately before purchase.
Current InVideo Paid-Plan Snapshot
The official pricing page displayed these annual-billing figures when checked on July 14, 2026. They are a dated comparison, not a guaranteed checkout quote.
| Paid plan | Displayed annual-billing price | Included monthly credits | Listed positioning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plus | $17/month ($200 billed yearly) | 75 | Exploring |
| Max | $85/month ($1,000 billed yearly) | 390 | Occasional use |
| Generative | $170/month ($2,000 billed yearly) | 800 | Daily use |
| Elite | $900/month ($10,800 billed yearly) | 4,250 | Power creators |
The same official page lists unlimited watermark-free exports on paid plans, on-demand credit top-ups, and access to its AI model catalogue. Credit costs vary by model and can change, so compare plans with a representative project’s measured retry cost rather than dividing credits by a generic “video” count.
If you need to verify watermark, export, stock, and rights boundaries before purchase, use the InVideo pricing verification checklist. This page owns the current paid-plan credit comparison.
Evaluation vs. Paid: The Stable Decision
| Decision | Free or evaluation path, if currently available | Paid path |
|---|---|---|
| Best use | Test prompt quality, editing flow, and one representative deliverable. | Repeat a proven workflow with more credits, stock choices, or team features. |
| Budget question | Can the product produce an acceptable draft for your real brief? | What is the cost per accepted output after retries and edits? |
| Usage limit | Verify whether an evaluation path is currently offered and inspect its allowance in the product. | Verify included credits, model-specific consumption, reset rules, and top-up pricing. |
| Production check | Expect evaluation constraints; confirm watermark, download, and usage terms. | Confirm stock licensing, commercial terms, seats, privacy, and support for the exact plan. |
How InVideo Credits Work
InVideo’s official pricing FAQ describes credits as platform currency used for video creation, generative models, and other features. Different models can consume credits at different rates. The company also notes that credit costs may change and that unused credits do not roll into the next month.
That makes a simple monthly price comparison incomplete. Track three numbers during a trial:
- Credits used for the first generation.
- Credits used for retries before the output is acceptable.
- The number of accepted deliverables you can finish within the billing period.
The useful metric is cost per accepted output, not the advertised number of generations.
Which Plan Path Fits?
Stay on the evaluation path when
- You are still testing whether prompts produce usable scenes and narration.
- You make occasional personal drafts and can tolerate evaluation limits.
- You have not checked the current download, watermark, stock, or usage terms.
Consider an individual paid plan when
- You have a repeatable brief and can estimate retry costs.
- You need the paid stock or model access shown on the current pricing page.
- You need predictable monthly production and top-ups are an acceptable fallback.
Ask about team or enterprise options when
- Several people need seats, shared billing, or approvals.
- Security, data handling, support, or procurement matters.
- A customer contract requires licensing or compliance evidence beyond a consumer checkout page.
Before You Pay
Record this evidence from the live checkout and official terms:
- Exact plan name, billing period, currency, tax, and renewal price.
- Included credits and the models or agents that consume them.
- Reset, rollover, top-up, upgrade, downgrade, and cancellation rules.
- Stock-provider access and the license that applies to the final deliverable.
- Watermark, export, collaboration, privacy, and commercial-use boundaries.
Plan names and allowances can vary by account, region, and promotion. If checkout differs from a comparison article, checkout and the current official terms are the decision sources.
Continue the AI Video Decision
- Use the InVideo 2026 purchase checklist when watermark, export, stock, or commercial-use verification matters more than plan capacity.
- Use the AI video workflow and model guide when retries, accepted-output cost, and production stages matter more than one vendor.
- Use the Higgsfield pricing guide for another source-safe creative-video buying checklist.
- Use the Sora 2 pricing guide when the query is specifically about Sora access and cost boundaries.
- Use Flowith AI Video to structure a scene brief before comparing generation workflows.
These routes do not imply equivalent models, rights, prices, or availability.
Bottom Line
If a free or evaluation path is currently available, use it to validate output quality. Then choose a paid InVideo path from the current credit allowance, retry cost, stock and licensing needs, and team requirements. Avoid any table that still treats weekly generation minutes as the current billing system.